Showing posts with label Electric Vehicles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Electric Vehicles. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

How much is a kWh?

Hello Readers,

As I was writing my series on Net Metering, it was pointed out to me that most people are not especially familiar with some of the units that I used in the article. Thus, in this post, I would like to offer a primer on units that are commonly used when talking about electricity (and how they relate to renewable energy and energy use). At the bottom of this post, I have also included a glossary of Energy Industry Terminology that you may encounter while reading about renewable energy and energy use.

What's a Watt?

A Watt (W) is a basic unit of power measurement. Watts are used to measure how quickly energy is consumed by or generated by a system.

But what about all of the prefixes?

Unit NameAbbr.MeaningAt This Scale
MicrowattsμW1/1,000,000th WattsWrist Watches
MilliwattsmW1/1,000th WattsLaser Pointers
WattsW1 WattLEDs
KilowattskW1,000 WattsAverage US Households
MegawattsMW1,000,000 WattsAircraft Carriers
GigawattsGW1 Billion WattsMedium Size Cities
TerawattsTW1 Trillion WattsLarge Countries
Note: whether a prefix is capitalized or not can alter its meaning in some cases.

How about a Watt-hour?

A Watt-hour (Wh) is a basic unit of energy measurement. Watt-hours are used to measure how much energy is consumed by or generated by a system.

1 Watt-hour is the amount of energy that would be consumed by or generated by a system if the system operated at power level of 1 Watt for a time period of 1 hour. Note that, all of the prefixes listed above apply to Watt-hours the same way that they apply to Watts (e.g. 1 kWh = 1,000 Wh).

Energy UsedAt This Scale
15 WhCompact Fluorescent Bulb for 1 hour
250 WhXbox 360 and LCD Television for 1 hour
1 kWhAverage US Household for 1 hour
23 kWhNominal Rating of Electric Vehicle Battery
12 MWhAverage US Household for 1 year
20 GWhSmall US Town for 1 year
57 TWhTotal Massachusetts Electricity Consumption (2010)
3,750 TWhTotal US Electricity Consumption (2010)

Watts or Watt-hours?

Despite the similarity in name a Watt-hour is very different from a Watt!

For example, If I asked you, "How much power are the appliances in your house using right now?" Your response should be something like, "They are consuming 800 W."

Likewise, If I asked you, "How much energy do the appliances in your house use in a year?" Your response should be something like, "They normally consume about 9,000 kWh."

If you used the two units interchangeably (such as answering the first question as "800 Wh" instead of "800 W), it would be the same as confusing any other two units.

For example, if I asked you, "How fast were you driving when the cop pulled you over?" and you answered, "About 30 miles." In this case, your answer simply does not make sense!

Appliance Power

The more Watts an appliance is rated at, the more energy it consumes. You can think of this as describing how 'hungry' an appliance is. That is, how much energy does the appliance need to consume in order to do its job? In many cases, a higher power rating means an appliance can work more effectively. Of course, a higher rating does not necessarily mean that an appliance is doing a better job, sometimes it can mean a lack of efficiency. To put this in perspective, let me offer two familiar examples.

Example 1: Microwaves
A 600 W microwave will typically take longer to cook your TV dinner than a 900 W microwave. In this case, the 900 W microwave is 50% more powerful than the 600 W microwave, which allows 50% more energy to be applied toward cooking your TV dinner each second that the microwave is running. In this example, the added power means the job is done more effectively.

Example 2: Light bulbs
A 100 W incandescent light bulb can often be replaced with a 25 W compact fluorescent light bulb and essentially the same amount of light will be provided. With each light bulb, enough light is provided to read a book each second that the light is turned on. In this example, the incandescent bulb is more powerful but less efficient, so a lot of energy is wasted by heating up the coils in the bulb.

Reading an appliance's power rating can also, sometimes, be a bit misleading. Some appliances - such as microwaves - have straight forward power ratings. (e.g. A 900 W microwave should be using 900 Watts of power when it is in use.) However, other appliances have power ratings listed that represent their maximum energy use.

Refrigerators, for example, are typically plugged in and 'turned on' all of the time, but a 720 W refrigerator is not constantly using 720 Watts of power. Instead, refrigerators may use their rated power for 5 minutes and then use no power for 25 minutes before switching back on again. In this case, a 720 W refrigerator would have a peak power consumption of 720 W and an average power consumption of 120 W (or 720 W x 5 minutes/30 minutes).

Generator Power

The more Watts a generation system is rated at, the more powerful it is. You can think of this as describing how 'strong' the generator is. That is, would energy being generated feel like a blast from a fire hose? Or, would it feel more like a squirt from a small water pistol?

Electric generator power ratings can also be a little tricky. For most types of generators (such as coal power plants, nuclear power plants, wind turbines, etc.), the so-called nameplate capacity indicates the maximum possible power generation under optimal conditions. However, solar photovoltaic (PV) generation systems can be especially confusing, because they have two nameplate capacities: an AC nameplate capacity and a DC nameplate capacity.

The AC nameplate capacity of a PV generator is relatively straightforward; it indicates the maximum AC power output that the system's inverter(s) can produce. On the other hand, the DC nameplate capacity of a PV generator indicates the expected cumulative DC power output for all of the solar PV modules under Standard Test Conditions (STC) without applying any derates, which in some cases compound to result in an actual output that is much higher than the DC nameplate capacity (see description below).

Solar PV Industry: Standard Test Conditions (STC)
In the PV industry Standard Test Conditions (STC) describe the production of a solar PV module at 25°C (77°F) at sea level with 1000 W/m² of incoming solar radiation (irradiance).

While changes in atmospheric pressure can contribute minor changes in the actual output, changes in temperature and irradiance significantly alter the actual output of a solar PV module at different locations and throughout the year (and even throughout a single day).

Depending on the location and time (and the amount of moisture and other particulates in the atmosphere) an array of solar PV modules may receive 100-1400 W/m² of solar irradiance during the daytime. This range includes irradiance both less than and greater than the STC irradiance. Greater irradiance will allows for a derate ratio that is greater than 1. Also, the cells in solar PV modules are better able to transfer electricity in cooler temperatures, which also allows for a derate ratio that is greater than 1.

As a result, on a hot (cloudy) summer day a solar PV module will probably have  much lower output than the DC nameplate capacity. Conversely, on a cold (sunny) winter day a solar PV module is likely to have an actual output that is much higher than the DC nameplate capacity.


In any case, it is important to remember that the nameplate capacity of a generator is a nominal power rating, so it alone will not tell you how much energy a generator produces in a year. To determine a generator's annual energy production, you will need to multiply the nameplate capacity by the capacity factor and the amount of time in a year (i.e. Nameplate Capacity [W]x Capacity Factor x 8,766 hours = Energy Production [Wh]).

Other Terminology

Well, unfortunately, it would take an entire book or a semester course to explain all of the nuances of power, energy, voltage, and current related to energy generation and consumption. However, to help you along, I have put together a brief glossary of terms that are commonly used in the energy industry. I decided to put them in a logical (rather than alphabetical) order, so that you can read the glossary a bit like a book.

Glossary of Energy Industry Terminology
Nameplate CapacityThe maximum* potential power output or consumption for which a generator or appliance is rated to operate under optimal conditions (so called because this is often the nominal value listed on the name plate of the system).
DerateA multiplier that describes what portion of a nominal system output remains intact after the effect of a non-optimal or non-standard condition is considered (often used to calculate the impact of changes in operating temperature or other environmental variables).
Capacity FactorThe Actual Power Output compared to the Nameplate Capacity over a period of time (typically as a %).
Availability FactorThe portion of time that a generator is physically able to operate (as opposed to being offline for maintenance; typically as a %).
Peak PowerThe maximum amount of power that is actually generated or consumed during a defined period of time.
Average PowerThe total amount of energy generated or consumed during a defined period of time divided by that amount of time.
Load FactorThe Average Power divided by the Peak Power for a defined amount of time (normally used to describe how well a utility grid is utilized; typically as a %).
Direct Current (DC)Refers to power that is generated, consumed, or transferred at a steady voltage during normal operation (commonly used in batteries and solar photovoltaic modules).
Alternating Current (AC)Refers to power that is generated, consumed, or transferred using a fluctuating voltage, which causes the current to alternate directions (commonly used in household appliances and long distance utility lines).
AC Voltage (VAC)The voltage range over which AC power fluctuates (in the US, household electrical outlets nominally operate at ~120VAC, which means the actual voltage fluctuates between +120V to -120V many times per second).
Grid VoltageRefers to the AC Voltage that must be maintained on a utility grid in order to ensure safe and reliable operation (neighborhood utility lines typically operate between a few hundred volts and several thousand volts).
Grid FrequencyRefers to frequency with which Grid Voltage fluctuates each second (in the US, household electrical outlets nominally operate at ~60Hz, which means that each second the Grid Voltage fluctuates through 60 cycles from +120V down to -120V and back up to +120V).
InverterA device that turns Direct Current (DC) power into Alternating Current (AC) power (a common component of solar photovoltaic generation systems).
ConverterA device that turns Alternating Current (AC) power into Direct Current (DC) power (often referred to as "AC Adapters" and are used in appliances and electronic devices that run DC power or rechargeable batteries).
TransformerA device used to increase or decrease voltage (higher voltages are used to transport power over long distances with minimal losses; lower voltages are needed to operate common appliances).
*For solar photovoltaic modules, the Nameplate Capacity typically indicates the DC power output during standard test conditions of the module during its first year of operation.

I hope that you found this post useful. In the future, I will try to link to this post whenever I have included one of the terms listed above.

Cheers,

Sean Diamond

Saturday, June 30, 2012

ColorPower - A Decentralized Smart Grid Technology

Hello Readers,

I hope you have been enjoying the on-going Global Sustainability series. This post is not in that series but instead is a weekend treat for the avid followers of this blog. Have no fear, the rest of the series is scheduled to post next week.



I was sitting in the lobby of an environmental non-profit the other week, and I happened to pick up a copy of the Spring 2012 issue of the MIT Energy Initiative's Energy Futures magazine in which I found an article about a new smart grid technology called ColorPower, which may be of particular interest for proponents of renewable energy, energy storage, and electric vehicles. The article, Tomorrow's power grid: Adjusting demand to meet supply (starting on page 11 of the magazine, page 13 of the pdf version), describes a 'smart grid' demand-side management technology that decentralizes the decision making process, giving the appliance users greater control over their electricity use and more privacy with regard to their habits.
I encourage you to read the article for yourself before proceeding any further. Here is the link again, in case you missed it: http://web.mit.edu/mitei/news/energy-futures/Energy_Futures_Spring_2012.pdf
I am particularly excited about this ColorPower technology, which is now being developed by Zome Energy Networks. As the article mentions, it could revolutionize the ability of homeowners to participate in their home energy use - especially with larger appliances. However, I think that it could also be (1) a key mechanism for electric vehicle charging and (2) a supplement and/or tie-in to energy storage devices.

In my dissertation (see the Background section), I specifically sought to avoid discussing energy storage devices that only worked in one direction (e.g. could only use electricity but not send electricity back to the grid), because on the electricity grid demand can be both too high and too low compared to supply. This is especially the case on a utility grid that includes a high percentage of renewable energy sources (such as solar photovoltaic and wind turbine generators). Thus, I was concerned that if I based the premise of my dissertation only on a technology that only had the ability to absorb extra energy when demand was lower than supply, I would be missing half of the equation.

During instances in which the supply is unable to keep up with the demand, the ColorPower systems could be used as envisioned by the system designer and described in the article - i.e. temporarily turning off or cycling down appliances based on the user preferences. In a mathematical sense, reducing demand is similar to sending more electricity onto the grid (the first half of the equation). However, I now believe that with the use of ColorPower or a similar technology much (but not all) of the role of bi-directional energy storage devices could be met with demand response, especially if it is used in combination with electric vehicles and thermal power systems.

If the ColorPower systems included a bi-directional switch, owners could not only elect to use less energy when demand is too high but could also request to use more energy when demand is too low. This may not seem practical when only considering traditional appliances. Instead let's consider non-traditional appliances such as electric vehicles and thermal mass systems (e.g. SmartBricks from Vcharge). In this case, appliance owners could prioritize their energy use so that it jumps (e.g. electric vehicles charge quicker than normal) whenever overall demand is too low and supply is too high .

As a result, if each building had some appliances set up to shutdown when demand is too high and other appliances set up to ramp-up use when demand is too low, each building could function in essentially the same role that energy storage devices filled in my dissertation. This sort of bi-directional demand response could also avoid some of the trouble with V2G systems that require EV batteries to be less than fully charged in order to function.



Well, that is all for now, I hope that I have provide you with enough links to keep you busy for the weekend.

Cheers,

Sean


Tuesday, June 12, 2012

A123: a better battery announcement

Hello Readers,

Today when I turned on my computer, I stumbled upon quite a surprise. One of the top headlines at the New York Times was all about batteries! Upon a quick search, I also found a similar article by Forbes that strips the issue down to the bare bones, no political commentary.

It turns out, the big news in an announcement by A123, which has already developed one of the first - if not only - commercially available utility scale energy storage units on the market, about a new Lithium-Ion battery technology called Nanophosphate EXT.

According to the manufacturer, the main benefit of Nanophosphate EXT will be its ability to operate in a wider temperature range with less control equipment required to maintain the batteries. While this may not sound like much, it could mean a lot for electric vehicle and renewable energy technologies.

For electric vehicles, it will mean a lighter-weight, more durable Li-ion battery. Think of a battery that allows the vehicle to go further and lasts the entire functional life of the average car today.


Although, it is not mentioned anywhere, this breakthrough could also have a significant impact on the cost, durability, and useful temperature range of remote (non-grid) renewable energy generation systems, such as solar photovoltaic systems that rely on a battery bank. With current battery technologies, system owners need to be especially careful when choosing the size of the battery bank attached to a remote energy system.

With typical lead-acid batteries (such as those normally used in non-electric vehicles and off-grid renewable systems), the characteristics of a battery vary greatly with the temperature. As a result, battery banks typically need to be over-sized to allow for extremely cold temperatures, when batteries have a diminished capacity to store energy. Additionally, typical lead-acid batteries have a limited 'cycle life', i.e. the amount of useful energy that the battery can store quickly decreases based on the number of times the battery is fully discharged and then fully recharged.

By comparison, current Li-ion batteries have a longer cycle life than lead-acid batteries, but they also require a lot of expensive, non-energy storing, control equipment in them to ensure stability (e.g. not catching on fire) and extend the life of the battery. However, according to A123, the new Nanophosphate EXT Li-ion battery, will require less of that equipment (think less expense) to operate safely AND be able to store more energy at lower temperatures AND have a longer cycle life.

So if A123 is able to bring this technology to market, it could be a game changer not only for electronic goods like laptops, but it could also impact energy storage in pretty much every area: regular vehicles, electric vehicles, remote renewable systems, and perhaps even large utility-scale renewable projects (see: the Background section of my Dissertation).

We shall have to wait and see!

Charged-ly,

Sean


Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Electric Vehicle GHG Emissions

Hello Readers,

Perhaps the question that I get most often from skeptics of electric vehicles is: "Don't the coal plants used to power an electric vehicle give off more (GHG) emissions than a gas powered vehicle?"

Well, the Union of Concerned Scientists have just released a study that investigated exactly that! And as it turns out, the answer is "No!"

I encourage you to take a look at the study, on the UCS website or download the full pdf version of the report. Although, the info graphic below (linked from the website) gives you the general idea:


Even in the areas of the US with the dirtiest (most coal-reliant) electric utility grids, the emissions from an a fully electric vehicle are still better than a 27 mpg sedan. Of course, some of the most efficient hybrids may tip that balance in the dirtiest regions; however, by charging up your EV with solar and wind you can ensure that the EV will come out on top!

So if you are in the market for a new vehicle, check out a list of the electric vehicles that are commercially available in the US today.

Cheers,

Sean

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Energy Future TED Talk

Hello Readers,

This is potentially the most important and informative TED Talk you will see this decade. The speaker is the head of the Rocky Mountain Institute.

Please watch this.

Thanks,

Sean


Friday, April 27, 2012

Li-air Batteries for EV's

Hello Readers,

Today, I stumbled across an interesting article on IBM's research initiative to develop light-weight electric vehicle batteries that store charge using lithium and oxygen from the air. A short video from the article is below, and more links about energy storage are given in the article as well.

Enjoy,

Sean


Monday, August 29, 2011

Another EV: Smart's "ED"

Hello Readers,

This is my last post for August. I plan on starting my regular posting again after Labor Day. I hope you stayed relatively dry this weekend!

A review in the New York Times of the "Smart ED"... it's a bit of mixed review, but we have to start somewhere.

~Sean

Saturday, August 27, 2011

1000 Mile Electric Vehicle

Hello Readers,

I plan on returning in full force in September. However, in the meantime, check out this article from Treehugger about an electric vehicle that went 1000 miles on a single charge.

Cheers,

Sean Diamond

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Bill Ford's TED Talk

Hello Readers,

I thought you might find this interesting. Bill Ford (of Ford Motor Company) has given an interesting TED Talk. It discusses potential efficiency gains in driving and transportation technology. It also offers an interesting look into the thoughts of an automotive industry leader. He even briefly references Ford's upcoming release of an all electric vehicle (the electric Ford Focus).



I would be curious to see what you think of his suggestions. While he does focus a lot on car-based advances, I am a little surprised to here him advocating for public transportation. Just imagine that suggestion from an auto executive 10 or 20 years ago.

Happy Summer,

Sean Diamond

Friday, May 6, 2011

Hello Readers,

When I saw this new TED talk about literally growing batteries, I knew I had to share it. This is especially relevant to our ability to manufacture batteries and other energy storage systems (as discussed in my dissertation).

Please enjoy!

~Sean

Friday, April 1, 2011

Obama sets goal of 1/3 cut in oil imports

Hello Readers,

This week President Obama reaffirmed and strengthened his previous statements from the State of the Union address about moving the country toward clean energy and specifically away from the use of petroleum-based fuels in transportation. In case you missed the announcement, here is a New York Times article that covered the announcement and it's implications.

Have a good weekend!

~Sean

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Electric Car Review Article

Hello Readers,

There are more dissertation posts coming, but I thought you might be interested in this New York Times review of the new Chevy Volt (and other electric cars).

~Sean